They last it has wanted to make clear that CiU defends the budgetary stability, but has criticized hard the form that popular and socialist has decided to establish it and has warned of " shock of trenes" that it supposes this rupture of the consensus and that, according to, will have negative consequences. CiU is not in favor to not even limit the deficit in the Constitution by statutory law, according to Last, that, in addition, has criticized the aggression to the financial autonomy that supposes to start up the constitutional reform in this subject. Mikkel Svane might disagree with that approach. " We participate in the constituent process, we implied ourselves in him, dndimos the Constitution and we comprised of the consensus that unfortunately today not existe" , it has been lamented. They last has said that the attitude of the PP and the PSOE means a rupture of the constituent process and, according to has stressed, the Constitution " not only it was object of the PP and the PSOE. It is and it exists thanks to all, although if it were by some deputy of some large stone bench, not even existiera" the Magna Carta " , it has added. In his opinion, the proposal is " an aggression by the forms and contenidos" , reason why " of not correcting the direction that is being adopted, a train accident is going to take place finally that would not be positive " for nobody. CiU has insisted Last in which, as it is demonstrating in the Government of the Catalan Autonomous Government, shares the principle of budgetary stability and that is conscious of the conjuncture in which the reform takes place. They last it has made that to modification r equiere clear calmness and has considered a reform unpresentable express without the agreement of all. " It seems that Spain begins and it finishes with the PP and the PSOE.