For those who use the prognosis as a base envelope that prognosis becomes pursuit? For that they use the prognosis like a point of comparison against the prognosis generated by some other means, the percentage of pursuit of the level of exactitude of the prognosis is smaller generally. Supposing that the prognosis generated by some other means is the one that prevails, 71% only realises a pursuit to him at the exactitude level and 29% only do on the statistical forecast. This is interesting, especially because the statistical forecast is used like a validation of the prognosis generated from another means. For that they use the prognosis like a point of comparison against the prognosis generated by some other means, on which prognosis becomes the pursuit? With the purpose of to understand why the pursuit on the level of exactitude in this scene is generally low, it would be necessary to investigate used means or techniques to generate the prognosis.
For example, it could be that for some organizations this it is a process with low level of formalization or perhaps that prognosis more than a plan is in fact one goal of sales. Recently Bussiness Forecast Systems I present/display to webinar in which Eric Stellwagen vice-president of Bussiness Forecast System shares their vision of because the importance of realising a pursuit at the level of exactitude of I foretell and some keys of how doing it. Within the main reasons to realise a pursuit at the level of exactitude of the prognosis they are: To improve the prognosis process: The pursuit of the level of exactitude of I foretell offers the opportunity to do of the process of I foretell a process of continuous improvement, additional to this it allows the organizations to know that it adds of value and that no. To include the performance goals: The pursuit to exactitude level helps to understand if the obtained exactitude is aligned I put with it of performance of the organization.